Skip to main content

Female prospects - 14 Feb 2011

Movement is generally underestimated, imo. It is v difficult to succeed at the top without it - Lindsay Davenport is a notable exception. But the quickness of Serena, Venus, Henin, Clijsters, Hingis, Graf, ASV is more typical of a top player. Even Seles and Sharapova (who are moderate movers in my book) were most successful when they were young and at their quickest.
I think there are 4 main considerations to assess the potency of a player's game (and their future potential!):
1. movement
2. ability to hit winners
3. avoidance of error
4. mental toughness.
Put these all together and you have a champion of Serena-like or Graf-like proportion.
Kim Clijsters, for instance, is pretty strong overall, but just below the top in avoidance of error and, occasionally, mental toughness. But she's good enough to be a top player and win slams, especially when the competition isn't dominated by someone excelling at all 4 categories.
In assessing the Wozniacki/Azarenka/Kvitova/ARadwanska/Wickmayer generation it seems to me that Wozniacki scores the highest in a combination of the 4 categories. She's a good mover, avoids error, and is mentally strong. She's not as good at hitting winners and that is making picking up that first slam so tough - with Serena and Kim questionable in the long term, Wozniacki should rise to a slam title unless someone else comes along excelling at these 4 aspects of the game. Is there anyone on the horizon who will do this?
Azarenka is fantastic at hitting winners. She's an acceptable mover, but can be error-prone and suffer mental lapses - she might be mentally tough on one day and not the next. It's going to be tough for her to rise much higher than where she is now, I think. She might be able to concentrate her way through a slam at some point if she can cut down on errors inspite of the burden of her movement.
Kvitova is kind of in the Lindsay Davenport mold. Given her youth she's probably moving as well as she ever will. She hits winners well and can be mentally tough. If she can avoid error she has a real shot at a short stint at the top or (more likely) a Major title. The difficulty for her will be movement. Like Davenport, she can win a slam title if she can blast winners, avoid error, and move as well as she can - but I don't see her becoming a long-term #1. She's not complete enough in all 4 aspects.
ARadwanska is a decent mover, mentally tough, and avoids error but will always have trouble hitting winners. Because she has less power (winners) than Wozniacki she will always be in her shadow.
Wickmayer struggles on a number of fronts - not a great mover, too many errors, and only sporadically mentally tough.
Nor does the future look great for Maria Sharapova. She's never been a great mover but has overcome it in the past by blasting truck loads of winners and incredible mental toughness. However, her 2.0 version continues to fail because of the enormous number of errors she hits. With more than one weakness (errors and movement) I do not foresee a change in her fortunes unless she can get the errors under control.
Bottom line is that of the young generation, Wozniacki seems to have the greatest amount of the 4 fundamentals in place. But she will continue to be just below the best until she can hit more winners.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roland Garros Men – 2025 Preview

  Will anyone beside the Top Two make the final of the French Open at Roland Garros this year? Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz look a class ahead of the field.   But with Sinner’s rust and Alcaraz’s occasional inconsistency, the door may open for others – Casper Ruud, Jack Draper, Alex Zverev, maybe even Novak Djokovic…   Top Quarter Jannik Sinner has just returned to the tour after a probably-undeserved three-month suspension for doping. The locker room is visibly nervous about receiving a similar fate; they are on edge as the sword of Damocles hangs over all, seeming to strike randomly. A re-working of the doping protocols is probably in order.   Regardless, Sinner performed reasonably well in his first tournament back in Rome last week, making the final.   He will likely have some ups and downs, but playing best three of five sets in slams will likely give him time to find his game if he should start a match on the wrong foot. He was close to winning...

Roland Garros Women – 2025 Preview

There’s not really a favourite for this tournament – which feels a bit weird, since Iga Swiatek has won it four of the last five years.   She’s also been #1 much of that time, but as of today is ranked only #5.   In her absence, Aryna Sabalenka has been entrenching herself at the top with multiple finals played this year, winning three of them.   The six clay tournaments since Miami have seen six different winners, so the answers are not clear cut.   Maybe Jasmine Paolini who won last week in Rome, in conditions very similar to Paris, should be regarded as the first horse.   She was indeed runner-up in the City of Lights last year.   Top Quarter Aryna Sabalenka has been burning up the tour this year. The top seed has opened her lead at #1 to nearly 4000 points.   Other than wobbly performances in Doha and Dubai, she has been a factor in every tournament she’s played.   Impressively, she’s 11-2 on clay.   It’s hard not to regard her a...

Men’s Tennis 2024 Yearend and 2025 Predictions

2 January 2025   The Big Three is dead!  Long Live the Big Three!  For the first time in 22 years, none of Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic are in the yearend top three.  Instead we have a new set – Sinner, Alcaraz, and Zverev.  Now it would certainly be debatable if Zverev has the significance of the other two. Afterall, he still has not won a slam and he’s half a generation older than his younger counterparts.  At age 27 he should be mid-arc in career accomplishments – but in some metrics he’s just starting out.  However, his superlative play over the year landed him at #2 and who are we to argue with the algorithm? One of the biggest clouds hanging over the coming year is the fate of Jannik Sinner.  By all accounts he is the top dog, and primed to have another banner year, but whether or not he will get to play depends on what happens with WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency).  Anyone can see he’s essentially innocent – I mean, a massage...